Please consider the following items while reviewing:
- Does the manuscript have a novelty?
- Do the authors state the study's aims clearly?
- Is the study design appropriate to the stated aims?
- Does the study rationale/justification have clarity for conducting?
- Does the manuscript/study adhere to relevant reporting guideline(s)?
- Does the writing have clarity and logic (i.e., does not impede scientific meaning or cause confusion)?
- Do the manuscript of the same type (e.g., original research) follow a consistent structure, outlined in the instructions for authors?
- Does the abstract provide a complete and accurate description of the content of the manuscript?
- Are the methods described in sufficient detail so that the experiment could be reproduced?
- Do the statistical analysis of the data have accuracy?
- Do the ethics and data availability statements are complete?
- Are the figures and tables well-annotated and easy to read and interpret?
- Does the discussion section have comprehension?
- Does the study have any limitations that have been mentioned?
- Do the conclusions support the data?
- Do the references have the appropriate number?
- Do the statements support appropriately by parenthetical citations?
